Research reports CBA 2009

 

 

David A. Bosworth, The Catholic University of America

“Does Lamentations Help?: Paradoxes of Emotional Expression”

Does the book of Lamentations (and lament generally) serve a therapeutic purpose? Conventional wisdom answers affirmatively and sometimes grounds this claim in the “grief work” theory of Sigmund Freud. However, modern psychological study has undermined the grief work hypothesis. The paper will briefly summarize the psychological trauma that follows foreign military occupation and address whether or how the poetry of lament serves to facilitate healing. The analysis will draw on modern empirical psychological studies to understand the situation of the Israelite under Babylonian rule and how ritual and writing may serve therapeutic ends or intensify psychic injury.

 

Susan A. Calef, Creighton University

“‘It Shall Not Be So Among You’ (Mark 10:43): Implications for A Markan Spirituality”

This report focuses on the critique of abusive authority that is an essential element of Mark’s narrative theology. Part I attends to two troubling aspects of Mark that cannot be ignored when reading for the purposes of spirituality: 1. the portrayal of the Jewish leaders as “villains” in the plot; and 2. the comparative marginality and passivity of women in the Markan narrative.  Part II consists of a narrative analysis of the Jesus and the Powers-That-Be story-line that will simultaneously expose the workings of abusive authority and illumine the nature of true authority.

 

Warren Carter, Brite Divinity School

“Festivals and John's Rhetoric of Distance”

This paper explores the intertextuality between the numerous references in John's Gospel to festivals and the festivals that pervaded the urban context of Ephesus.  Section 1 justifies this unusual exploration, noting doubts about the Martyn-Brown synagogue-separation scenario, recent developments in understandings of Jewish diaspora communities, and recent studies of John's intertextuality with Ephesus and its imperial culture. Section 2 outlines the pervasive presence of festivals in the city. Section 3 argues that the Gospel constructs festivals as occasions or spaces in which conflict and condemnation occur. Section 4 argues that the intertextuality between the narrative construction and cultural context destabilizes festivals to reveal fundamental incompatibilities and distances Jesus-believers from them.  

 

Mary L. Coloe, P.B.V.M., Australian Catholic University

“Pentecost in the Fourth Gospel”

The Jewish Festival of Weeks/Pentecost is a major Feast missing from the sequence of Jewish festivals in John 5-10.  This paper argues that the Festival of Pentecost provides the background for the opening scenes in John 1:19-2:12. The opening days of the Gospel narrative draw upon the structure and liturgical themes of this festival and the festival provides insight into Johannine theology.

 

Joan E. Cook, S.C., Georgetown University

“Malachi and Memory”

In its efforts to teach the members of the Second Temple community, the book of Malachi transposes the traditions of ancient Israel to a new and sometimes puzzling key.  This two-pronged presentation approaches the book in light of memory theory, first as a way of understanding Malachi's message to the Second Temple community, and second as a model for reappropriating ancient traditions in today's world.

***

John Granger Cook,  LaGrange College

“Suffering in 1 Peter:  local anxiety, empire, and the imitatio Christi

The issue of suffering in 1 Peter has been a lively one in recent scholarship.  The question of persecution is fundamental for understanding the letter.  Specialists, however, have recently tended to pass over the relevance of Roman law.  History (Nero's and Trajan's persecutions), law, and an analysis of the semantic field of the words for suffering in the letter need to be synthesized anew. " 

 

Deirdra A. Dempsey, Marquette University, and

Rudolph H. Dornemann,  ASOR

“Continuing Excavations at Tell Qarqur, 2009 Season”

In the 2009 season, we continued to excavate in all of the Areas excavated in 2008.  In Area A, we removed the majority of the Roman and Hellenistic levels thereby opening the underlying Iron II building sequence.  We widened and deepened the step trench east of Area B.  In Area E, we worked deeper in the Early Bronze IV levels at the north edge of the Temple.  In Area D, we removed a second destruction layer in the EBIVB, recovering many smashed pottery vessels.  In Area W, we opened a new area of Roman-Byzantine buildings south of Area D on the low tell.

 

Peter Dubovsky, S.J., Pontifical Biblical Institute

“Causes of the Downfall of the Northern Kingdom

Deuteronomist redactors provided two sets of theological and sociological interpretations of the downfall of the Northern Kingdom; the first one is in 2 Kgs 15 and the second in 2 Kgs 17. This paper will focus on 2 Kgs 15. This analysis will have two parts. In the first part I will analyze chapter 15 and in the second part I will point out some sociological and theological phenomena which according to the deuteronomist writers caused the downfall of the Northern Kingdom.

 

Susan M. Elliott, Independent Scholar, Red Lodge, Montana

“Jesus’ Teachings about God’s Family Empire vs. Caesar’s Family Empire

Family metaphor grounds assumptions in much political and moral discourse.  Linguist George Lakoff has discerned different family models at the root of current political divisions.  Family models in the first century also framed understandings of nation and Empire.  Early Christians assumed a variety of family models to counter the metaphorical “family” of the Roman Empire.  As part of a current book project on early Christian responses to the Roman family and Empire, this report will share a chapter on family metaphor in the teachings of Jesus.

 

Daniel J. Harrington, S.J., Boston College School of Theology and Ministry

“Soteriology in the Wisdom of Solomon”

The paper examines the book of Wisdom from the perspective of soteriology. That is, it explores each of its three major parts with an eye toward what the audience is being saved from, what it is being saved for, and how it might be saved. In each part the process of salvation —the initial state, the new state, and how the transition happens—is somewhat different. Likewise the meaning of what the audience is being saved from ranges from “ungodly” or unrighteous behavior, to ignorance, and then to idolatry. The author looks for help from God as “the Savior of All” and from his surrogates or mediators—Wisdom and the Word of God.   

 

Jozef Janćovǐc, Faculty of Catholic Theology of Comenius University, Bratislava

“Ambiguous Echo of the Golden Calf narrative in Torah”

The Golden Calf narrative about the great sin of Israel (Ex 32-34 // Deut 9:1-10:11), foreshadows the idolatry of Jeroboam in 1 Ki 12:25ff.

Likewise, the overall structure of Exo 32-34, with the reconciliation and the renewal of covenant, contains allusions to the original fall (Gen 2-3), the Flood narrative (Gen 6-9), and partly to the subsequent story in Num 13-14. The paper offers the inner-biblical exegesis of the stories along with their intertextuality in the canonical context. Finally, it compares the concepts of human sinfulness (Gen 6:5;8:21; Exo 32:9; 33:3.5; 34:9) and of God´s repentance (Gen 6:6; Exo 32:14).

 

Joseph E. Jensen, The Catholic University of America

“Unforgivable Sin: A Contextual and Intertextual Study”

Mark's pericopes "Collusion with Satan" (3:19b-30) and "Healing the Paralytic" (2:1-12) form an inclusio, sharing concerns for forgiveness or non-forgiveness of sin, and blasphemy (2:5, 7, 9-10; 3:28-29). In one intervening pericope, "Plucking Grain on the Sabbath" (2:23-28) Jesus relates an incident "when Abiathar was high priest", when according to 1 Sam 21:1-9 Ahimelech was the priest. Mark's substitution of Ahimelech's son Abiathar better serves to associate Mark 2:1 - 3:30 with the "Sin of the House of Eli"(1 Sam 3:13-14), "blaspheming God", a sin that "shall not be expiated by sacrifice or offering forever".


Henry Ansgar  Kelly, University of California, Los Angeles

“Lucifer:  the Good, the Bad, and the Really Bad (Jesus, Nabuchodonosor, and Satan)”
 
Light images (stars, dawn, sun) regularly designate the coming of the Messiah in the NT (e.g., Matt. 2.2; Luke 1.78), and the figure of Venus as Morning Star (Lucifer) is applied to Jesus three times.  One exception is the "failed stars" of Jude 13 (drawing on 1 Enoch 18 and 20).  An earlier failed star was Helel ben Shahar in Isaiah 14, referring to the King of Babylon, a passage that came into prominence in the LXX version among the early Fathers.  Origen transferred the Lucifer reference from Nabuchodonosor to Satan, and this identification came to overshadow the Messianic applications of the NT.

 

Karl Allen Kuhn, Lakeland College

“The Cardiography of Biblical Narrative”

 Affective appeal in varying forms is the means by which narratives, including biblical narratives, compel readers to enter their storied world and entertain the version of reality they present.  Biblical scholarship, however, has long neglected the pathos of biblical narrative, pursuing instead the meaning of texts as reconstructed through a solely cognitive, non-affective, methodological lens.  This paper introduces several techniques authors of biblical narrative commonly employ to engage their readers, not only cognitively but also emotionally.  It then illustrates the exegetical benefits of attending to the pathos of biblical narrative by presenting an “affective-rhetorical” reading of the annunciation of John’s birth in Luke 1:5-25.

 

Alice L.  Laffey, College of the Holy Cross

“Recovering the Metaphor: Hosea 1-3”

Hosea 1-3 and the text’s traditional biblical interpretation have identified Hosea with God and Gomer with Israel in a marriage metaphor that depicts Gomer as whoring, idolatrous Israel.  More recently feminist scholars have decried the text that, produced in Israel’s patriarchal society, divinizes the male, and identifies the female with infidelity; they also decry the patriarchal assumptions of most male biblical scholars (and some female scholars) whose interpretations have confirmed the assumptions, and identified the female with sin.  This paper attempts to rehabilitate the female, identify the male head of household as the proper audience for the passage, and provide an more inclusive canonical interpretation. 

 

Eric F. Mason, Judson University

“The Heavenly Sanctuary in Hebrews and Second Temple Judaism”

A significant issue in interpretation of the Epistle to the Hebrews concerns how to understand the author’s discussion of a heavenly sanctuary.  Does the author conceive of an actual sanctuary in heaven, or should language of a heavenly sanctuary be read metaphorically?  In large part the decision about how to understand the heavenly sanctuary language is determined by one’s understanding of the author’s conceptual framework, whether primarily Platonic or apocalyptic. I will argue that the author of Hebrews—like numerous contemporary writers in Second Temple Judaism—did indeed think in terms of an actual sanctuary in heaven.

 

Geoffrey D.  Miller, St. Louis University

“All Because of a Woman? Tobit's Exclusion from the Jewish Canon”

 Previous attempts to explain Tobit's omission from the Jewish canon have focused on its late date of composition, its allegedly faulty marriage contract, and other aspects of the book. More plausible is that Tobit was denied canonical status because Tobit's wife Anna is too radical for patriarchal sensibilities. Anna's success as a wage earner and her eloquent attacks against her husband pose a threat to the status quo, reversing traditional gender roles. This situation is analogous to the Book of Judith, a book also excluded from the Jewish canon where a female character contravenes cultural norms.(96)

 

 

Robert D. Miller II, The Catholic University of America

“Revisiting Oral Tradition and The Deuteronomistic History”

"Oral tradition," with its checkered past in biblical studies, is used arbitrarily, invoked to identify orally-composed texts. We have borrowed from folklore- and orality-scholarship, especially the "Oral-formulaic" school of Parry and Lord, that proposed telltale features in writing revealing oral origins. Yet by 1990, the Parry-Lord School was obsolete, its main tenets questioned by fieldwork. My essay outlines contemporary linguistic scholarship in mythology and folklore, which is then applied to the Deuteronomistic history and used to model its genesis from the 7th to 5th centuries. In so doing, insights of the Scandinavian Traditions Historians of a century ago are revived.

 

Robert L. Mowery, Illinois Wesleyan University

“A Ring-Shaped Pattern in the Sermon on the Mount”

The Sermon on the Mount contains a five-step movement from theological statements which contain divine passives (Matt 5:4-43) to direct theological statements which refer to the heavenly Father (5:45-6:8) to the Lord's Prayer (6:9-13) to a second series of direct theological statements (6:14-32) to a second series of statements with divine passives (6:33-7:19).  The fact that the Lord's Prayer stands at the center of this five-step ring-shaped pattern provides additional support for the claim of Ulirch Luz and others that this prayer stands at the center of the Sermon.

 

David Penchansky, University of St. Thomas

“Wisdom, Madness and Folly: The Vexation of Qoheleth”

One of the difficulties with interpreting the Book of Ecclesiastes is that the text makes conflicting assertions:  The quest for wisdom is meaningless/wisdom exceeds folly; All is empty and pointless/hard work and close relationships give life meaning; life is bitter a short and holds no pleasure or meaning/God enables humans to enjoy life; piety is futile/humans must fear God .  To understand Qoheleth requires one to come to grips with these tensions.  Some claim that the author “tries out” different ideas, only to reject them.  Some see the hands of different authors.  Others privilege certain positions.  I suggest that the book is about these tensions, and each of the book’s tensions give insight that cannot be obtained by isolating a particular voice. (122)

 

Ahida E. Pilarski, Saint Anselm College

 A Study of the References to BaT-`ammî in Jer 8:18-23: A Gendered Lamentation”

Jer 8:18-23 is generally categorized as a lament and the phrase BaT-`ammî, "daughter of my people," appears four times within this lament.  Scholars have proposed that the main voice behind this lament could be that of the prophet Jeremiah himself, or of Lady Jerusalem.  Based on significant elements present in this literary unit, and on recent studies in Mesopotamian laments, this study argues, first, that the main lamenter in Jer 8:18-23 is Yahweh, and second, that this lament reflects the influence of a Mesopotamian motif, the one of the weeping goddess, showing in this way the gendering of a lament.

 

Barbara E. Reid,  O.P., Catholic Theological Union

“Birthed from the Side of Jesus”

The theme of birthing weaves throughout the Gospel of John (1:3-4, 12-13; 2:1-11; 3:1-21; 4:4-42; 7:37-39; 16:21) and culminates in the crucifixion and post-resurrection scenes (19:25-27, 34; 20:19-23), offering an interpretation of the death of Jesus as a birthing of new life.  These birthing images, accompanied by the portrait of Jesus as one who willingly lays down his life for his friends (10:17-18; 13:1-20; 15:13-17), offer a strong antidote to atonement theologies. 

 

Earl Richard, Loyola University, New Orleans

“Structure, Function, and Meaning of Mark 8:22-26”

At the end of a boat trip Jesus heals a blind man at Bethsaida.  Does this striking miraculous episode mark the end of Jesus’ mission stay in Galilee or does it signal the start of a lengthy journey to Jerusalem?  What is the episode’s structural and thematic relation either to the healing of a deaf-mute (7:31-37) or the giving of sight to Bartimaeus (10:46-52)?  Further, why is Jesus presented as healing a blind man in stages?  Is the episode meant primarily as a symbolic event; if so, symbolic of what?  Goal: analysis of Markan redaction in search of Markan meaning.

 

Mark S. Smith, New York University

“Warrior Culture in Early Israel and the "Voice" of David in 1 Samuel 2”

This presentation asks about the social locus that gave rise to several of the allegedly old poems preserved in the prose books of the Pentateuch that surround military activity.  These poems point to a subculture of warriors in ancient Israel that produced texts celebrating victories and lamenting the losses.  I will focus on the poem in 2 Samuel 1 as an examplar of Israel's warrior culture, with particular attention focussed on the voice of the speaker.

 

Thomas D. Stegman,  S.J., Boston College School of Theology and Ministry

“Reading egrapsa in 2 Cor 2:9 as an Epistolary Aorist: Argument and Implications”

The verb egrapsa in 2 Cor 2:9 is almost universally interpreted, in light of the previous paragraph (esp. v. 4), as a simple aorist. That is, Paul’s statement in 2:9 is regarded as further explanation for writing the “tearful letter.” I propose reading egrapsa as an epistolary aorist, describing why Paul is writing in the present. This interpretation allows a smoother reading of the flow of Paul’s presentation in vv. 7-10 and avoids the difficulty of his providing conflicting reasons for writing. Reading egrapsa as an epistolary aorist also has implications for the question of the unity of 2 Corinthians.

 

Blažej Štrba, Comenius University, Bratislava

“The Prophet like Moses”

 According to the majority of diachronic theories, Deut 34:9 was supplemented by the later redaction of vv. 10‑12. Such a solution receives support from a synchronic reading, which finds a tension between 34:10 and 18:15, 18. The widely accepted description of 34:10‑12 as MosesĆ epitaph exalts him as a prophet without equal. In spite of the present tendency to stress the prophetic incomparability of Moses, I challenge a superlative interpretation of v. 10, and I present a different reading of 34:9‑12, considering vv. 10‑12 as dependent on v. 9. In other words, the proposal is to see Joshua as the prophet like Moses.

 

Charles H. Talbert, Baylor University

“Is Matthew Interested in Character Formation?”

This report attempts to answer briefly several questions: What is character? What is character formation and how did the ancients try to do it? How does Matthew fit into the ancient context? How can Matthew function today to shape the character of its readers?

 

Jerome T. Walsh,  School of Ministry, University of Dallas

The Rab Shaqeh between Rhetoric and Redaction

 Abstract: Analysis of the complex use of quoted speech in the Rab Shaqehʼs first discourse (2 Kgs 18:19-25) clears the way for observations about the persuasive force of the discourse on three levels: the rhetorical strategy of Sennacheribʼs putative original speech, the rhetorical strategy of the Rab Shaqehʼs presentation of that speech, and the rhetorical effects of several other quoted speeches that pervade the discourse.

 

Peter S. Williamson, Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit

 “Scripture Across the Curriculum”

The 2008 Synod of Bishops on “The Word of God in the Life and Mission of the Church” called for “a renewal of academic programs… so that the systematic study of theology is better seen in the light of Sacred Scripture…and a revision of courses in seminaries and houses of formation …[so] that the Word of God have its deserved place in the various dimensions of formation.”

            This paper proposes remedial interdisciplinary principles and practices to revive Scripture as the soul of theology, spirituality, pastoral ministry and mission in the formation of clergy and other pastoral ministers. 

 

John T. Willis, Abilene Christian University

“Crucial Dream and Vision Experiences”

 The Hebrew  Bible contains several dreams and visions, including those of Abram (Gen. 15:12-21), Jacob (Gen. 28:10-17), several individuals in the story of Joseph, a Midianite (Judg 7:9-18), Samuel (1 Samuel 3), Nathan (2 Sam. 7:1-17); the calls of Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel, dreams in the story of Daniel, Solomon (1 Kgs 3:4-15), and Eliphaz and Elihu in Job. In such experiences, Yahweh assures his people, announces forthcoming events, and calls individuals to accomplish Yahweh's mission.

 

Ziony Zevit, American Jewish University

“Jewish Liturgy in Late Antiquity and the Jewish Jesus Movement Until ca. 200 CE”

In 1 Cor 1: 22-23, Paul writes that  "... Jews demand signs and Greeks desire wisdom, but we proclaim Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews ...."  In this verse, Paul recognizes that the Jews with whom he spoke didn't get "Christ crucified,”  By implication, he indicates that there were other  teachings that were not “stumbling blocks.”

      This paper reports on research into which stories and which claims about Jesus would have been acceptable and why. It proposes that a consideration of Jewish liturgy with its implicit theology helps to provide a suitable response to these questions.